Skip to main content
Cookies Policy
Detailed information on the use of cookies on this website is provided in our Privacy Policy. By closing this message and proceeding, you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookies Policy.

Govts Urged to Avoid Slowing Sharing Economy

Monday, 18 Apr 2016


But important role to play around labour laws.

Governments should not try to slow the growth of the peer-to-peer economy to protect vested interests, given the potential value in getting the new online economy right, according to thinktank The Grattan Institute.

In a new report, the Institute said that legalising Uber nationwide alone could save Australians “more than $500 million on taxi bills”.

So-called sharing economy platforms could also “increase employment and income for people on the fringe of the job market”, and so governments should make sure they do not impede this kind of growth potential, the thinktank said.

Government has an important role to play in supporting its growth while reducing any downsides, it said.

“Some say peer-to-peer platforms bring hidden costs by risking work standards, consumer safety and local amenity, and by potentially eroding the tax base,” Grattan productivity growth program director Dr Jim Minifie said.

“These worries are not groundless but they should not be used as excuses to retain policies, such as taxi regulation, that were designed for another era and no longer fit.”

However, the report recommended government intervention in a number of areas, including ensuring employee safeguards for those that found work on these new services.

“Tens of thousands of Australians are already working on peer-to-peer platforms,” the Institute said.

“These platforms will mostly improve an already flexible labour market, but governments must strengthen rules to prevent employers misclassifying workers as contractors, and bring some platform workers into workers’ compensation schemes.”

New platforms that recruit cyclists to deliver food recently came under fire for allegedly underpaying workers, who they pay as “independent contractors”.

The thinktank said it did not believe such workers should be reclassified – only that governments should take some action to make sure existing employment laws are adhered to, while adding some “safeguards” for workers on these platforms.

Click HERE to read the full article.