Australian Computer Society
Level 3, 160 Clarence Street, SYDNEY NSW 2000
Ph: (02) 9299 3666, Fax: (02) 9299 3997,
http://www.acs.org.au/ E-mail: info@acslink.net.au
v1.1 issued 6 August 1997
Contents
Introduction
The primary aim of this paper * is to provide advice to members concerning the
contracting out of IT services.
This has become important particularly, but not exclusively, because of the
current high level of interest in the government outsourcing of IT by federal
and state government agencies in Australia.
A secondary purpose is to make such a paper available as a part of a
submission
to the
Senate Finance and Public Administration References Committee for its IT
Outsourcing inquiry.
6 August 1997
* This paper has been prepared by Ian Dennis, FACS and David Goble, MACS, both of
Whitehorse Strategic Group Ltd, and draws upon previous material developed by
the Out-Right task-force, including Dr. John Houghton and Dr. Ed Lewis. The initial brief and final editing was provided by Tom Worthington,
MACS, with additional input from others.
It is important to be clear about what is meant by outsourcing. Outsourcing
has become a commonly misused term, and much of the apparent disagreement over
the merits and risks of outsourcing can be traced to differing definitions.
Outsourcing is essentially a how rather than a what term. It
describes how IT services are obtained; not what the services
are. (1)
Outsourcing has been defined as:
"A contractual relationship where an external organisation takes
responsibility for performing all or part of an agency's Information
Technology functions. This can involve a partial or complete transfer of
staff and/or resources."
(2)
This definition is in the context of public sector agencies, but could be equally applied to company outsorcing.
Outsourcing is:
"An arrangement whereby a third party provider assumes responsibility for
performing information systems functions at a pre-determined price and
according to predetermined performance criteria."
(3)
These definitional statements highlight the features that are the essential
aspects of outsourcing, namely:
- size and duration of contract;
- transfer of assets; and
- breadth of responsibilities.
In a sense outsourcing is just a name for old practices. Services such as,
bureau services, contract programming and project management have long been
`outsourced'. In its present usage, however, outsourcing implies a greater
level of handing over ownership and/or managerial control than has hitherto
been the case. (4)
Thus:
- there are differences between `outsourcing' and `contracting out';
- outsourcing is distinguished from the in-house provision of services; and
- in-house provision means that the people who deliver the IT goods or services
are normally employees of the organisation.
ACS members working as contractors under the day to day supervision of the
organisation, are in a different position to those brought in by an outsourcing supplier.
There are many factors involved in the outsourcing equation, and the importance
given to them will depend on the circumstances of each case.
Outsourcing can reduce both fixed and recurrent costs.
Outsourcing vendors should be in a position to reap economies of scale that may
not be available to the client alone. The vendor can save on IT hardware and
software costs through consolidation of operations and through operating from a
stronger bargaining, bulk purchaser position in the market for both products
and support services. However, recent research (12) indicates that economies of scale may have changed for IS.
Outsourcing can allow a client organisation to focus on its core business.
If Information Technology, computing and/or communications, are not core line
of business, or are not in an area in which the organisation has a comparative
advantage, then outsourcing can be of benefit.
Client organisations can gain access to the skills they require as and when
they are required, and can call on resources of the supplier for highly
specialised skills and/or in unusual situations.
Many organisations find keeping up with technical developments in computing and
communications very difficult. Operational decisions in regard to the
operation of computing and communications are often adversely effected by a
lack of in-depth knowledge of the full range of technical options available.
This can lead to using inappropriate technology and/or inappropriately using
technology.
Many organisations find that they bear high fixed costs to cover an unbalanced
workload. Maintaining the level of equipment and human resources required to
cover workload peaks can leave an organisation with unfertilised resources for
a significant proportion of the time. Outsourcing the workload peaks can bring
considerable savings.
Formalising service delivery brings greater accountability. A well written
contract can clarify responsibilities and sharpen management focus on key
deliverables (14) at project, operational and tactical levels. A further outcome of
this formalisation can be a greater focus on service quality, and a consequent
quality improvement.
Many of these advantages can accrue just from the process of examining
the outsourcing option, as a consequence of self-examination and formalisation.
That is to say that they can accrue without outsourcing per se.
While there can be advantages in outsourcing there are a number of
things that can go wrong. It is prudent to stop and ask several questions (12) : what are organisation's intentions, what problems is it intended to solve questions (16), have vendors solutions to these problems? Organisational initiate outsourcing for reasons other than cost efficiency.
Outsourcing involves considerable costs in the administration of tendering and
in the ongoing supervision and management of contracts.
One potential disadvantageous trade-off is the existence of hidden or
additional costs. One of the hidden costs in an outsorcing contract can be the erosion of staff skills. Contracts generally provide for IT staff to move to the outsource company, with a guaranteed period of employment. This provides a pool of staff with knowledge of the client's business and local conditions. However, over time there may be cost pressures to use less trained and overseas staff, with a resulting lower quality of service.
Entering a long-term contract with a mainframe computer vendor may prove to be
a disadvantage when changing business or technological circumstances bring a
need to migrate to an alternative solution.
It is essential that control over the information resource be carefully
considered.
If human resource management (HRM) issues are not handled well, any outsourcing
venture will likely fail to realise advantages.
It is essential in all cases to develop `career options plans' for affected
staff at an early stage. These must, at the least, involve an outline of the
alternative career paths and employment options that the proposed outsourcing
arrangements might involve.
Lock-in to a long-term contract and to a single supplier can lead users back to
a kind of vendor dependence that open systems promised to move them away
from.
Contract failure and "backout" scenarios must also be explored and costed.
Rebuilding in-house IT capabilities from scratch will be time consuming and
expensive. The risk of having to do so must be quantified as far as possible,
and backout and failure plans prepared.
Concerns over privacy and confidentiality are often cited as a major barrier to
outsourcing IT functions. The issues of privacy and confidentiality must be covered within the contract, to protect the clients commercial interest and the interests of customers, suppliers, and employees of the client. But this need not be an insurmountable
barrier.
Clear delineation of right over intellectual property within a contract is
essential. This should be built on the foundation of a thorough intellectual
property audit undertaken as a pre-cursor to outsourcing. The interests of third parties also need to be identified. Suppliers of IT hardware and software may place conditions on access to IP by staff of outsourcing company, where the company is a business competitor.
A cost of the use of outsourcing is forgone benefits which come from alternative strategies. Before surrendering management control of a "strategic asset" and entering "partnerships", organisations should ask not "should we outsource IS?" "where and how can we take advantage of the rapidly developing market of IS services providers?" (13).
ACS members may be involved in outsourcing as suppliers; consultants to any of
the parties to the contract; and IT operatives, for either the outsourcing
company or the agency being outsourced. In any of these activities ACS member
actions will be subject to the Trade Practices Act, contract law and other
streams of law. The ACS Code of Ethics (10) and Code of Professional Conduct and
Practice (11) are highly pertinent to the outsourcing process, since a members
ethical consideration for outcomes beneficial to the employer or client may, in
some cases, lead to recommendations of personal detriment to the member.
ACS members may be involved in all of these aspects in the key concerns of:
- setting in place the most appropriate incentive structures for the
organisations concerned;
- matching organisational cultures and structures in such a way as to
create a workable and constructive operation;
- setting in place appropriate incentive structures for the staff or the
two organisations; and
- setting up the most appropriate organisational structures for the later
exploration of the skills and knowledge developed and, importantly, for the
exploration and/or preservation of any intellectual property developed during
and within the contract.
ACS members could be involved in judging whether a case can be made that
contracting out of IT will lead to better organisation outcomes compared with in
house IT provision. In this context, ACS members may be asked to help determine
how important are specific IT services to the achievement of organisation outcomes in
terms of the degree to which the organisation's core processes depend on these IT
services.
ACS members may be asked, on a specific case by case basis, what kind of impact
the contracting out of IT will have on:
- accountability;
- the fitness of the of the service;
- the extent, source and sustainability of cost savings; and
- the suitability of particular activities for contracting.
ACS members may be asked by either vendors or agencies to use their skills and
special knowledge in:
- defining the IT goods and services to be delivered; and
- opening an organisation's IT services to competition from external
suppliers.
Outsourcing is consistent with the ethical provision of professional and
technical services by ACS members to their employers or clients.
The application of Outsourcing by Government and major employers has
significant implications for ACS members, however, working within all
components of the outsourcing process.
Outsourcing should not be imagined to be a panacea solution to perceived IT
problems. Used appropriately, it can deliver cost savings and other benefits,
used inappropriately it can significantly diminish service levels, incur major
reconstruction costs, and cause social damage. (Refs: 3, 4, 6)
Consistent and continuing evaluation of IT operations and services are important. Outsourcing can be part ensuring cost-effectiveness and quality service delivery and in
maximising Australian technical and professional skills in IT.
Such assessment should be independently conducted according to established methodologies to ensure that the
vested interests of neither vendors nor organisation personnel incorrectly impact the
results.
"Whole of government" IT outsourcing is, however, a high risk approach (18). There are risks due to the large scale, long lead times, potential loss of services across government and differences in agency requirements. There may be difficulties in the Australian IT industry absorbing large outsourcing contracts. Other approaches might be used to achieve the desired cost benefits, with lowers risks and to permit the Australian IT industry to benefit. (7)(8)
Some case studies of outsourcing in public sector organisations (15) indicate that public sector information systems can be critical, complex and volatile, due to the nature of political decision making. This makes outsourcing less attractive. Recent indications are that the Australian Government understands that outsourcing should not chosen just to circumvent inflexibilities in the public sector accounting systems (17).
Outsourcing assessment processes are a valid tool for Government and private organisation in matching operations to strategic needs. However, particularly the case of government there is a need for processes to be open, accountable and participatory. Decisions made behind closed doors and communicated as a fait accompli are not in the public interest.
- 1.
Dr. John Houghton, CIRCIT Policy research paper No 31, Absratct:
http://www.circit.rmit.edu.au/prp.html)
- 2.
Geoff Kilby, Duesburys, Unisys U3 Conference, 1993
- 3.
Dianne Northfield, Outsourcing of IT Services: Case Study of the Contract Between the
Tricontinental Royal Commission and ICL Australia Pty Ltd, CIRCIT April
1992, Absratct:
http://www.circit.rmit.edu.au/rr.html)
)
- 4.
April Leung, ADFA, Formulating a Business strategy for the use of
outsourcing in Public sector Organisations, 1992
- 5.
Ian Dennis, Whitehorse, Chris Arkey, Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, Service
Costing, Department of Defence CSP-IT, 1994
- 6.
Australian National Audit Office, Audit Report No 45 - Department of
Veterans Affairs: Outsourcing, 1992
- 7.
GITC Strategic Review Committee Report to CEO's, Rec: 10.d, 1994
- 8.
Karl Reed, Australian, p52, July 1, 1997
- 9.
Whitehorse Strategic Group Ltd, Out-Right Phase 0, 1995
- 10.
ACS Code of Ethics
http://www.acs.org.au/national/pospaper/acs131.htm
- 11.
ACS Code of Professional Conduct and
Practice
http://www.acs.org.au/national/pospaper/code2.htm
- 12.
Information Systems
Outsourcing: Myths, Metaphors and Realities,
M. Lacity & R. Hirschheim, J. Wiley & Sons, Chichester, May 1993, 296pp.
Abstract: http://www.cba.uh.edu/~rudy/out-book.htm
- 13.
Beyond the Information Systems Outsourcing Bandwagon: The Insourcing Response,
M. Lacity & R. Hirschheim, J. Wiley & Sons, Chichester and
New York, August 1995, 245pp. Abstract: http://www.cba.uh.edu/~rudy/in-book.htm
- 14.
Outsourcing Contracts - Key Management and Administration -
Considerations, Philip Argy, ACS Member's Handbook
http://www.acs.org.au/handbook/argy.htm
- 15.
IS outsourcing by public sector organisations, L.A. de Looff,
14th World Computer Congress (IFIP96), 1996 http://www.acs.org.au/president/1996/ifip96/i96iso.htm
- 16.
Investigation of Outsourcing Internet Services, M. da Cruz,
ACS NSW Branch Conference, 1996
http://www.ramin.com.au/marg/outsourcing.html
- 17.
Defence I.T. Support Services Tender Announced, Minister for Defence Industry, Science and Personnel, Media Release, 15 May 1997
http://www.adfa.oz.au/DOD/mdisp/m970515.html
- 18.
ACS Urges Caution on Whole of Government IT Outsourcing,
Media Release, Friday 11 May 1997, Canberra
http://www.acs.org.au/news/outsourc.htm
Comments to
Tom Worthington MACS, President of the Australian Computer Society tom.worthington@tomw.net.au. An RFT version of this document indicating changes from the previous draft is available.
About the ACS
The Australian Computer Society was established in 1966
and is the recognised association for IT professionals in Australia;
attracting a large and active membership from all levels of the IT
industry, providing a wide range of services and
opportunities for networking and career enhancement. It has become the public voice of the
IT professional; the guardian of professional ethics and standards in IT; with a commitment to
the wider community to ensure the beneficial use of IT.
See also
-
- Australian Computer Society Senate Submission on Outsourcing
- The Professional's view of IT Outsourcing, Keynote Address, Canberra Branch 1997 ACS Conference, 1 November 1997
- "Contracting out of government services", Friday, 5 September 1997,
Proof Hansard (
231 kbytes of PDF), Senate Finance and Public Administration References Committee
- Federal IT policy switch: target, a home run, Ian Davis, Australian Financial Review, Thursday, 21 August 1997
- Outsourcing Hypothetical,
Joint ACS/SQA/SPIN Technical Session, 21 May 1997
-
Outsourcing for no good reason?, Tom Worthington,
National Press Club Address, 11 December 1996
- Efficiencies in Whole of Government Information Technology Infrastructure in Budget Paper No. 2 - "Budget Measures 1997-98", Department of Finance, 1997
-
Hearing on outsourcing, Finance and Public Administration
Senate Committee, 1997
- OUTSOURCING: A game for losers, Paul Strassman, Computerworld, 21 August 19995
- Earlier drafts of this paper are available: 4 July 1997 and 27 July 1997
- ACS Home Page
- Tom Worthington's Home Page